" I TOTALLY changed my opinion about how an atheist COULD be because of some of the non-theists here."
Tammy, Thanks for sharing your generous opinion of atheists on page 46. Give the nature of this thread I am surprised that you had no response to such a reconciliatory and understanding post. Then again perhaps I am not! Understanding another person’s point of view shows empathy not agreement. I never refer to myself as an atheist but I accept that it seems to be a default position for non-theists or those who cannot find evidence that a personal God exists, as defined in most major religions. I prefer to think of myself as an agnostic, if such a thing exists.
The question I ask is simply – Is the universe aware of itself? I believe it may be. Not awareness in the way humans think of awareness due to their overdeveloped right brain function. Such pervading awareness would be aware of the billions galaxies and the existence of life of which it would be a part. It would not be responsible for how the universe unfolds or joy or suffering on our planet. I have read a number of book by Lyle Watson which report on an interconnected ness of all living creatures that goes beyond the know laws of science.
If I were to believe in a personal God I would become angry at his complacency toward suffering on earth. Not just among humans but the carnage and suffering that has been at the centre of all life on earth in its struggle to survive, since the world began. I can accept that’s just the way it is. Survival of the fittest has been the defining intention among all life on earth. Humans and some animals show what we call love to their young and others within their social group. A closer study shows that social animals and humans benefit and survive better when they show ‘love’ to those in their social group. Both animals and humans will turn on those that threaten their existence even if they have loved them. Love is real – as real as being alive.
My personal conclusion is, at present is, that whatever universal awareness exists, it has not yet been explained by major religions or Holy books. If a God, or his Son, is able to personal talk to humans then they would be personal responsible for the well being of humans. That would take away free will and be contrary to how life on earth operates. I can contemplate the idea that an impersonal, impassive awareness exists that is not responsible for suffering or accountable to humans. We as humans could therefore not be held accountable to such a being. Perhaps there are thousand of planets with life on them that come and go over eternity.
The appeal of a personal Father and his son who talks to us is an understandable but a rather human concept. I have stated many times that I envy those who are able to have faith in powerful spiritual friends who have power over life and death. Alas if such a God existed I would be faced with solving the opening question that is the subject of this thread. Debating with other seekers of truth help us to develop empathy and understanidng and all contributions have value. There can be treasure in the seaweed.